Preservation Alerts


The 78th PVI, Co. F proudly supports battlefield preservation efforts.

Development Threats
Thirty acres of Civil War battlefield land are destroyed every day! Click here to see those on the Civil War Preservation Trust's most threatened list:  Endangered Battlefields

Battlefields as Green Space

Hanover's Cold Harbor made list of 10 most endangered

Tuesday, Apr 22, 2008

By PHIL RIGGAN

inRich.com

The name "Cold Harbor" is said to originate from a pre-Civil War tavern that was a haven for travelers seeking food and shelter from the cold.

The area still acts as a haven -- nearly 150 years after the War Between the States -- but mostly for plants, animals and people looking for peace and quiet in nature.

The Richmond National Battlefield Park protects more than 2,000 acres of land in its 11 units spread throughout Richmond and the counties of Chesterfield, Hanover and Henrico.  Other than a few small parking lots, tour roads and visitors centers, most of that land is essentially green space -- protected nature preserve.

Civil War parks "act a green space where trees and plants can grow in an area where development pressures are high," said Kristen Allen, natural resource management specialist for the park.

More than 280 acres of that sacred Civil War soil are found at the Cold Harbor Battlefield in Hanover County.

In its annual report, "History Under Siege," the Civil War Preservation Trust listed Cold Harbor in the top 10 most endangered battlefields, stating that "pressure in the Richmond area is so great that only about 300 acres of what was once at least a 7,500-acre battlefield are currently preserved."

Robert Krick, historian for the Richmond National Battlefield Park said "the purpose of the list is to increase national awareness. The upper portion of the battlefield [to Bethesda Church] is gone. The area is getting squeezed [by development].

"Cold Harbor is considered the classic example in Virginia of trench warfare," Krick said. The prolonged battle there May 31 to June 12, 1864, saw combined casualties for Confederate and Union troops reach more than 16,000. 

Krick enhanced the park's historical value with this quote from "Trench Warfare Under Grant and Lee: Field Fortifications in the Overland Campaign," by Earl J. Hess: "Although small in comparison to the total volume of works constructed here, the Cold Harbor Unit protects the most singular set of Civil War fieldworks we have."

PUBLIC AWARENESS

The Civil War Preservation Trust works closely with the local governments and park services to help improve public awareness.

"Sometimes people forget where the battlefields are located, and why they are important," said Mary Koik, spokesperson for the Trust.

"We hope communities weigh the significance of the battlefields when making decisions on development," she said, adding "we spend most of our money preserving land." 

On the subject of nature preservation, Koik said that viewing "the parks as open space, green space, helps everyone -- you want to preserve something. More bang for your buck."

BATTLEFIELD AS NATURE PRESERVE

Allen helped answer some general questions she often fields from park visitors about the way the parks are maintained:

"Why don't they cut the grass or clean up the dead trees?"

RNBP lacks the personnel to maintain all of its land at the same level. Lawn areas that are around main visitor areas are maintained like one would maintain their yard, she said.

However, larger historic fields serving are typically maintained as either agricultural fields or tall native grass meadows, which provides several benefits:

• Looks more like a fallow farm field that might have existed during the 1860s than a manicured lawn;
• Requires less fuel, oil, and avoids creating air pollution associated with using tractors;
• Requires no lime or fertilizer;
• Provides much needed habitat for ground nesting birds, small mammals and reptiles.

In addition, forested areas are divided into "managed forest" and "natural zones," she said.

Managed forest occurs on some of the park's earthworks to help prevent erosion and protect the embankments. In natural zones, dead trees are usually left standing and downed wood is usually left on the ground, providing an important habitat for cavity nesting birds and mammals, as well as reptiles and insects.

"How do you maintain the battlefield as it was laid out for the Civil War?"

Park historians, including Krick, spend time researching historic photos, maps and accounts to determine exactly what the landscape looked like at the time of the Civil war, Allen said.

Once they agree on a battlefield layout, they next develop a cultural landscape report that incorporates all historical elements with the current landscape conditions, physical history of the site, and makes recommendations for how to rehabilitate the historic landscape.

"In general this seems to strive for making the landscape look just as it did during the 1860s unless there is some issue with feasibility or biological resources," Allen said.  Her example: a riparian area may have been cleared of forest vegetation during the Civil War, but that practice is now known to be environmentally unsound.

"How you maintain the Civil War earthworks?"

"Rain and wind are the two elements that cause erosion to areas of bare soil," Allen said, "especially when those areas are sloped as earthworks."

The park primarily tries to minimize bare soil and practice several management regimes for earthworks:

• Full forest cover. These are generally well protected from erosion by their thick leaf litter and thick vegetation which intercepts rain as it falls toward the ground. Only maintenance at those sites is the occasional removal of "hazard trees."
• Open forest where the underbrush is trimmed once per year and the tree canopy is allowed to remain to provide protective leaf litter.
• Covered with tall native grasses. Since these grasses are deeply rooted and grow tall, they provide good protection and require little maintenance compared to other grasses. In addition, and they allow visitors to easily view the earthworks and provide a landscape similar to that of the 1860s.

"What about the plowed land on the battlefields?"

"Our farmers understand that we are fairly restrictive on our agricultural leases because we don't want to damage our streams and soils," Allen said.

Farmers are limited in the pesticides they can use and the park avoids agricultural leases within 150-200 feet of water courses on park land, she said.  Most farmers grow hay, soybean, winter wheat and corn on the battlefields.

Contact Phil Riggan: 649-6037 or priggan@inrich.com

Development eyed near Kentucky's biggest Civil War battlefield

By BRUCE SCHREINER

Associated Press Writer

LOUISVILLE, Ky. --

Homes and businesses may someday fill the landscape on a stretch of pristine property once within earshot of cannonfire from Kentucky's bloodiest Civil War battle.

Landowner Pete Coyle envisions turning the approximately 34-acre tract on the edge of Perryville into a housing subdivision along with an assisted living center and limited commercial development.

A national Civil War preservation group is so worried by the proposed development that it placed the Perryville battlefield site on a list of the nation's 10 most endangered Civil War battlefields.

The designation this week comes amid a rezoning proposal that would clear the way for the development.

The proposal won approval recently from a sharply divided Danville-Boyle County Planning and Zoning Commission but still must win backing from the Perryville City Council. Perryville Mayor Anne Sleet said Friday that she hasn't made up her mind on the plan.

The development in the central Kentucky town about 85 miles southeast of Louisville would be visible from hilltops about a mile away at the battlefield, where more than 7,500 Union and Confederate soldiers were killed, wounded or missing after five hours of fighting in October 1862. A Confederate withdrawal after the battle secured Kentucky for the Union.

The Perryville battlefield - which includes nearly 670 acres that have been preserved - has long been considered a historic gem because of little or no modern encroachments. The battlefield draws about 100,000 visitors yearly and has been the site of two national Civil War re-enactments this decade.

"When you're here, you're in 1862," said Chris Kolakowski, executive director of the Perryville Enhancement Project, a preservationist group. "I could take any veteran of the Battle of Perryville ... out to the ground that they fought on, and they would be able to recognize where they were."

The property wasn't the site of fighting but was a key transportation route as troops marched toward battle and some came back bloodied and wounded to be seen at makeshift hospitals, he said.

Kolakowski said he'd prefer that the property remain undeveloped, but there's a bigger concern - an adjoining 52-acre rural tract closer to the battlefield.

That property is also owned by Coyle, who has had talks with the state about a possible conservation easement to protect the 52 acres from development. Coyle said he hopes an agreement can be reached, but added, "anytime you're dealing with the state with budgets, you never know."

The talks come at a time when Kentucky lawmakers are putting together the state's next spending plan while grappling with a nearly $900 million projected revenue shortfall over the next two years.

"We are supportive of preserving this property, and we very much want to work with the landowner on it," said Gil Lawson, a spokesman for the state Commerce Cabinet, which includes the state parks department.

"However, with the current state budget situation, funding for parks is very limited."

The rural property is separated from the battlefield park by a 50-acre tract owned by someone else.

Coyle envisions the subdivision becoming a haven for empty-nesters and retirees. The addition of just over 50 homes, the assisted living center and commercial development on a couple of lots would be a boon to the historic town of about 800, generating new tax revenue in a community with little growth opportunity, he said.

"There's no other place to build in the city," he said. "So this is kind of a salvation for the city."

James Lighthizer, president of the Civil War Preservation Trust, sees it differently. He said the rezoning applications threaten the "historical integrity of the area."

It was the first time that the trust, a nonprofit battlefield preservation group, added the Perryville battlefield to its annual list of the nation's most endangered Civil War battlefields.

Kenneth Noe, an Auburn University history professor who has written a book about the battle, said he was "floored" to see the Perryville battlefield added to the endangered list.

"I can't think of anyone who has done a better job of preserving a battlefield than the people of Perryville and Boyle County," he said.

He's worried about the proposed development and even more concerned about the precedent it might set. "It could have national implications," he said. "If it can happen at Perryville, it can happen anywhere."

Kolakowski said it would be the first major residential development on the end of Perryville closest to the battlefield. "Do we want to see it stay agricultural? Yes," he said. "But we're realistic enough to know that may or may not be a possibility."

The property includes a strip of land that was a road used by the Confederates to move soldiers to the front, haul supplies and transport wounded troops to hospitals. Coyle said he wants to see that strip turned into a hiking and biking trail that would lead from town to the battlefield.

The development would be visible from a couple of hills at the battlefield, including one where Confederate artillery was positioned and soldiers moved to attack Union lines further west, Kolakowski said.

"The way the terrain is out here, anything within about two or three miles of the park is going to be visible and is going to impact the vista and be an intrusion on the landscape," he said.

Still, Kolakowski sounded conciliatory in discussing Coyle's development plans, with his bigger concern being safeguarding the 52 rural acres from development.

"It's his property," Kolakowski said. "We're trying to balance his desire to develop it with preservation needs. We're trying to strike the best balance."

Coyle said he'd like to see an outcome in which the 52 rural acres are left undeveloped.

"There was blood shed there; people being carried back from the battlefield to the hospitals," he said. "It's still hallowed ground."

 

Wilderness Purchase Victory  

On July 19, 2007 , the Orange County Planning Commission met for the rezoning of a 176 acre tract, from agricultural to general commercial zoning.  The application was for property west of Route 20, in the vicinity of Route 3.  This area is in close proximity to the Grant’s Knoll property held by the Central Virginia Battlefield Trust and the National Park property that includes Grant’s headquarters in the Wilderness as well as the Lacy House, Ellwood, the site of Stonewall Jackson’s amputated arm, field hospital in the 1863 Chancellorsville campaign, and focal point in the 1864 Wilderness battle.  

Central Virginia Battlefield Trust was instrumental in convincing the Orange County Planning Commission and the Board of Supervisors to deny that request.  It is with great pleasure that we can announce that the National Park Service has purchased and closed on the Dotson property, December 19, 2007 .  This ground will now forever be preserved as part of one of the nation’s most endangered battlefields, the Wilderness. 

 (Courtesy: On the Skirmish Line: The Central Virginia Battlefield Trust)

Links to Preservation Organizations

Home